Product-specific review
Quantitative formulation, ingredient functions, product category, application site, user group and normal or reasonably foreseeable use.
HomeOur servicesCPSR & Cosmetic Safety Assessment
COSMETIC PRODUCT SAFETY · TECHNICAL DOCUMENTATION
Product-specific scientific assessment and documentation support based on the formulation, intended use, available evidence and target market.
Prefer email?[email protected]
Quantitative formulation, ingredient functions, product category, application site, user group and normal or reasonably foreseeable use.
Review of ingredient toxicology, consumer exposure, stability, microbiological quality, packaging, impurities and relevant labelling evidence.
EU/GB CPSR support where applicable, with market-specific cosmetic safety substantiation for India and the United States.
ToxWriter supports cosmetic manufacturers, brand owners, importers and private-label companies with product-specific safety assessments and technical documentation. For products intended for the EU and Great Britain, this may include preparation of a Cosmetic Product Safety Report (CPSR). For India and the United States, the deliverable is scoped to the applicable national requirements rather than assuming that an EU-format CPSR is mandatory.
A CPSR is a product-specific safety report required for cosmetics placed on the EU market under Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009. Corresponding requirements apply in Great Britain under its cosmetics framework. It has two parts.
Part A assembles the information needed to assess the finished product, including:
Part B records the safety assessor’s evaluation and conclusion. It includes:
The report must be specific to the formulation and intended use. A generic ingredient list or Safety Data Sheet alone is not sufficient to demonstrate the safety of a finished cosmetic product.
The Product Information File (PIF) is the wider regulatory file maintained for a cosmetic product. The CPSR is one component of the PIF—not a substitute for the complete file.
Under Article 11 of the EU Cosmetics Regulation, the PIF contains:
The EU PIF must be kept for 10 years after the last batch was placed on the market and made readily accessible to competent authorities at the Responsible Person’s address. Great Britain has corresponding PIF requirements under its applicable framework. The Responsible Person/manufacturer remains responsible for maintaining the complete PIF and meeting other market obligations.
Official reference: Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 — Articles 10 and 11 and Annex I
The list below is a practical client checklist. The exact documents needed depend on the product, available evidence and intended market; not every test or certificate is mandatory for every cosmetic.
India has its own requirements under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940, the Cosmetics Rules, 2020 and applicable BIS standards. Do not describe an EU-format CPSR as universally mandatory for Indian cosmetics; scope the safety assessment and dossier to the applicable Indian requirements.
FDA does not prescribe a universal EU-style CPSR format or a specific set of tests for every cosmetic. MoCRA requires the responsible person to ensure and maintain records supporting adequate safety substantiation, alongside other applicable requirements. The US deliverable should therefore be described as a cosmetic safety assessment or safety-substantiation dossier.
For systemic endpoints, the margin of safety may be calculated as MoS = NOAEL / SED, where NOAEL is a suitable no-observed-adverse-effect level and SED is the systemic exposure dose. An MoS of 100 is a common starting point where its assumptions apply, not a universal pass/fail rule for every ingredient or endpoint.
India and the US have their own cosmetic regulatory frameworks. They should not automatically be described as requiring the EU statutory CPSR format. The assessment documentation should match the applicable market requirements.
No. It may support the fragrance-use assessment but does not replace the overall finished-product safety assessment or all fragrance allergen and labelling information.
No. The checklist identifies commonly useful evidence. The assessor determines which documents and tests are necessary for the specific product, applicable requirements and available evidence.
Not automatically. Reports from stability, microbiological, preservative efficacy or other studies may be needed, but laboratory testing should be scoped separately when required.
Share the quantitative formulation, product type, intended use, target market and available supporting documents. This helps define the appropriate deliverable and identify material evidence gaps.
Discuss your cosmetic productShare what you have available. The scope can be clarified before work begins.