2. Identify the critical effect
A critical effect is selected from the available evidence and the point of departure is justified. The assessment should explain why the selected effect and endpoint are appropriate for the health-based limit.
Home→Resources
A PDE / ADE assessment is a substance-specific health-based exposure-limit exercise. The scientific rationale should connect the available pharmacological and toxicological evidence to the selected point of departure and the adjustment factors used.
The assessment starts with relevant pharmacological and toxicological information, including clinical findings and non-clinical studies as appropriate to the substance and intended use.
A critical effect is selected from the available evidence and the point of departure is justified. The assessment should explain why the selected effect and endpoint are appropriate for the health-based limit.
Adjustment factors address relevant sources of uncertainty, such as interspecies extrapolation, human variability, study duration and severity of the effect. The choice of factors should be justified.
Good-quality human clinical information can be highly relevant. Route-to-route extrapolation may also require consideration where the exposure route changes bioavailability materially.
The final PDE should be transparently linked to the critical effect, point of departure, adjustment factors and intended application, with references to the underlying evidence.
For optional scientific background on PDE derivation, see Challenges in setting permitted daily exposure limits for pharmaceuticals: A review by Ahuja and Krishnappa (2022), or view its PubMed record. This is a scientific review, not a regulatory guideline.
For official EMA and ICH references, see the HBEL, PDE, OEL and impurity references page.
Share the substance, product context, intended market and regulatory requirement. ToxWriter can review the scope and confirm the appropriate assessment pathway.